Supreme Court Decisions
Live coverage of the decisions released by the Supreme Court of the United States
-

-
DCCC chairman Steve Israel with an immediate fundraising email: Republicans threw everything they had at us, and they lost. With you standing with us, we can carry this momentum into November and win a Democratic majority to keep making progress. Please donate $3 or whatever you can right now. -
Rep. Todd Akin of Missouri: "Today, America is threatened with the Stage 3 cancer of socialism, and Obamacare is Exhibit 1." #scotusby josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 2:59:10 PM -

-
You know how after a big football game, fans of the two teams talk trash, and all of a sudden things get a little too tense? Yeah... #scotusby josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 3:00:58 PM -
Sign outside #scotus: "Justice Thomas may not ask questions, but we will answer them." Held up by high schooler in town for debate camp.by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:00:59 PM -
Huge questions coming out of this thing: What does this mean for the commerce clause? Call your local Con Law professor!by erin_gs via twitter 6/28/2012 3:01:49 PM -
From House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer: Our highest court has weighed in, and its decision to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a victory for all Americans who have ever worried about being able to access or afford the care they need. Democrats are proud to have worked hard to pass this landmark legislation in 2010 and of our efforts to make sure it is implemented in a way that continues to yield new benefits for patients, employers, and care providers.
From NJ Gov Chris Christie: I’ve been clear from the very beginning that I do not believe a one-size-fits-all health care program works for the entire country and that each governor should have the ability to make decisions about what works best for their state. Today’s Supreme Court decision is disappointing and I still believe this is the wrong approach for the people of New Jersey who should be able to make their own judgments about health care. Most importantly, the Supreme Court is confirming what we knew all along about this law – it is a tax on middle class Americans.
From House Ways and Means Chair Dave Camp: While I respect the ruling of the Court, they have granted the federal government unlimited power to intrude on the private lives of American citizens. I do not believe our Founding Fathers would have ever contemplated a federal government with this much power. This is a dangerous day for the future of civil liberties and the principle of limited government this country was founded on. This ruling ensures that Americans will now face an untenable choice of either paying a massive tax or higher insurance premiums. I will continue to fight to repeal the entire law and craft commonsense solutions that address the most critical challenge facing families and job creators – the high cost of health care. -

-
RT @RetireRevised Seniors will disagree, but #SCOTUS ruling is great news for health of everyone over 50. More in @reutersmoney column l#ACAby lauren.young via twitter 6/28/2012 3:03:53 PM -
More from the majority on why this is indeed a tax: "we have upheld such obviously regulatory measures as taxes on selling marijuana and sawed-off
shotguns. See United States v. Sanchez, 340 U. S. 42, 44–
45 (1950); Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U. S. 506, 513
(1937). Indeed, “[e]very tax is in some measure regulatory. To some extent it interposes an economic impediment
to the activity taxed as compared with others not taxed.”
Sonzinsky, supra, at 513. That §5000A seeks to shape
decisions about whether to buy health insurance does not
mean that it cannot be a valid exercise of the taxing
power. -
Ah--Court says shouldn't have granted cert in 1st American www.supremecourt.gov @tedfrank analysis?by AlisonFrankel via twitter 6/28/2012 3:04:18 PM -
Another high schooler held a sign saying the Anti-Injunction Act of 1867 barred a decision. #scotusby David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:04:54 PM -

-
She feels strongly "about having all sides of the argument represented."by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:05:13 PM -
Michelle Bachmann: court's decision "incomprehensible." Side note: Tea Partiers LOVE her - the crowd tripled the sec she showed up. #scotusby josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 3:05:47 PM -
More from the majority distinguishing between a tax and a "nenalty": The plaintiffs contend that Congress’s choice of language—stating that individuals “shall” obtain insurance
or pay a “penalty”—requires reading §5000A as punishing
unlawful conduct, even if that interpretation would render the law unconstitutional. We have rejected a similar
argument before. -
More from Roberts opinion: "The joint dissenters argue that we cannot uphold
§5000A as a tax because Congress did not “frame” it as
such. Post, at 17. In effect, they contend that even if
the Constitution permits Congress to do exactly what we
interpret this statute to do, the law must be struck down
because Congress used the wrong labels. -
Bachmann: decision ensures "black crowd" over economic recovery because of Obamacare. Protester: "Pass the mike, you suck!"by josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 3:07:19 PM -
Cheers of "We Love Obamacare" are attempting to drown out Michele Bachmann speaking, and they are succeeding. #scotusby David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:08:16 PM -
Roberts: Our precedent demonstrates that Congress had the
power to impose the exaction in §5000A under the taxing
power, and that §5000A need not be read to do more than
impose a tax. That is sufficient to sustain it. The “question of the constitutionality of action taken by Congress
does not depend on recitals of the power which it undertakes to exercise.” -

-
RT @deepakguptalaw: @AlisonFrankel @tedfrank I was in the courtroom, and Roberts was visibly frustrated (unusual for him), case not what...by AlisonFrankel via twitter 6/28/2012 3:09:01 PM -
There's an Obama supporter in the Tea Party crowd who's getting a...lukewarm welcome. "Goddamn college liberals, I can't take it."by josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 3:09:46 PM -
From Scalia's dissenting opinion: "Whatever may be the conceptual limits upon the Commerce Clause and upon the power to tax and spend, they cannot be such as will enable the Federal Government to regulate all private conduct and to compel the States to function as administrators of federal programs. -

-

-
retreating from twitter to concentrate on opinion, do some reporting. i'll post story later. bye for now, and thanks for following!by AlisonFrankel via twitter 6/28/2012 3:12:43 PM -


Politicians gather for their stand-ups on TV. Where's @SenatorCardin? p.twimg.com
by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:12:48 PM -

-


The pro-Obama crowd in action. Now cheering, "Four more years!" during Bachmann's speech. p.twimg.com
by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:15:09 PM -

-
From the NFIB..a party in the case: "Today the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) reacted to the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the individual mandate and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PPACA). The 5 to 4 decision went against what NFIB and 26 states argued in front of the Justices in our challenge against the constitutionality of the individual mandate.
“While we are certainly disappointed, NFIB respects the decision to uphold the individual mandate by the Supreme Court. Clearly this mandate has now become a tax on all Americans and a broken campaign promise from President Obama not to raise taxes,” said Dan Danner, President and CEO of the National Federation of Independent Business. “We are concerned about the precedent that this will set in Congress’ ability to mandate other aspects of our lives, but we will move forward from today to continue to fight, harder than ever, for real health-care reform for our membership.
“Under PPACA, small-business owners are going to face an onslaught of taxes and mandates, resulting in job loss and closed businesses. We will continue to fight for the repeal of PPACA in the halls of Congress; only with PPACA’s full repeal will Congress have the ability to go back to the drawing board to craft real reform that makes reducing costs a number one priority. The power and control of health-care decisions should be in the hands of the consumer, not the government.”
“This day will go down in history as the day when Americans lost a part of their freedom – the freedom to choose what they want to buy with their own money,” said Karen Harned, Executive Director of NFIB’s Small Business Legal Center. -

-

-
The Majority sums up its opinion: "The Affordable Care Act is constitutional in part and
unconstitutional in part. The individual mandate cannot
be upheld as an exercise of Congress’s power under the
Commerce Clause. That Clause authorizes Congress to
regulate interstate commerce, not to order individuals to
engage in it. In this case, however, it is reasonable to construe what Congress has done as increasing taxes on those
who have a certain amount of income, but choose to go
without health insurance. Such legislation is within Congress’s power to tax -
fordable Care Act.
The Framers created a Federal Government of limited
powers, and assigned to this Court the duty of enforcing
those limits. The Court does so today. But the Court does
not express any opinion on the wisdom of the Affordable
Care Act. Under the Constitution, that judgment is reserved to the people.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit is affirmed in part and reversed in part. -
Gotta own it MT @JeffreyToobin: Winner at #scotus is verrilli, solicitor gen.Among losers is me,who was so critical of of his oral argument.by erin_gs via twitter 6/28/2012 3:18:12 PM -

-
Whoops. Bachmann said "black cloud, not black crowd" - that's my typo, not her gaffe. But you get the point...by josephax via twitter 6/28/2012 3:18:47 PM -


Two senators, Graham and Barrasso, about to do an interview with conservative group FreedomWorks. p.twimg.com
by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:19:09 PM -
Lindsey Graham's message to Democrats: "Stand by your tax. Admit that it is a tax." Also: "My beef is not with John Roberts."by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:19:57 PM -
From the dissent: "If Congress can reach out and command even those furthest removed from an interstate market to participate in the market, then the Commerce Clause becomes a font of unlimited power, or in Hamilton’s words, “the hideous monster whose devouring jaws . . . spare neither sex nor age, nor high nor low, nor sacred nor profane.” The Federalist No. 33, p. 202 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961)." -
After healthcare industry, let the President take up now the Financial Sector and set it right. That should be the major issue he should fight his election, as it will also help job creation alongside. Besides Financial Sector reform will clearly draw a line between GOP and Democrats. -
More Graham to Democrats: "Did you mean to tax Americans?... This is the biggest tax increase in American history."by David Ingram via twitter 6/28/2012 3:22:15 PM
North Korea fires short-range missiles for two days in a row
SEOUL - North Korea fired a short-range missile from its east coast on Sunday, a day after launching three of these missiles, a South Korean news agency said, ignoring calls for restraint from Western powers.
- After crushing Mali Islamists, France pushes deal with Tuaregs
- Upmarket Pakistan district votes again as Imran Khan decries killing
- Syrian army, Hezbollah attack rebels in border town: opposition
- Afghanistan's Karzai seeks Indian military aid amid tensions with Pakistan
- Cameron 'losing control' as rift with party core widens
- Netanyahu takes aim at weapons 'leakage' in Syria
- EU says worried by Russia's human rights record



