Live chat with Michael Lewis
The author will be answering questions from Reuters.com readers on March 16
-
Here's a review of Lewis' new book by Hardy Green blogs.reuters.com -
Everyone knew the bubble would burst - was the bubble intentionally 'popped' by the Fed believing that they could 'control' the meltdown. All it would have taken is Greenspan, Bernanke and Paulson to whisper closed main lending switches at BofA, Wells Fargo and Goldman. That would start the chain reaction. So - where and exactly how did the chain reaction start? The impact, right at the end of the administration would poison the Obama Presidency and ensure a pendulum swing for 2012 and refund the bankers their lost loot at the expense of the taxpayers. -
Why credit Michael Burry as inducing Wall Street firms to offer credit default swaps against the failure of mortgage-backed derivatives? This was not good …… the CDO “insurance” was backed by reserves of as little as 3 cents on the dollar, and was merely used as another vehicle for making money. It too was a sham, and Burry had to know that insuring subprimes was an impossibility. -

-

-

-
Can any one rationalize why CDS need to exist when all they are are ostensibly nothing more than a wager in the 5th race at Aqueduct? These have proven to weapons of massive manipulation and destruction with lasting repercussions. If someone truly wants to hedge credit risk, have them take out default insurance and pay the effective cost of an underwriter holding the capital reserve. Will it not eliminate the manipulation and volatility in the markets? Loss at the tables in Vegas do not have the far reaching implication as investment losses on the markets. -

-
There is a material difference bewteen a credit default swap and credit default insurance. In the case of CDS there is no capital provide in support of the CDS, where as in the case of credit default insurance and the issuer of the insurance must set aside capital reserves. -

-
Here's Felix Salmon's review of the book bnreview.barnesandnoble.com -

-
Louis Ranieri was one of the most interesting characters in Liar's Poker.
I would very much like to know if Michael Lewis knows what Louis Ranieri's thoughts are on the securitised mortgage debt crisis ,since he was a major player in establishing the market for mortgage debt ,when he worked at Solomon Brothers.
I would also like to know if Michael Lewis or Louis Ranieri expected the crisis of Sept 2008 and after to unfold.I have great respect for Michael Lewis and Louis Ranieri.
Apologies for the indirect questions, but I have seen no interviews with Louis Ranieri thusfar. -

-

-
So the way I see it is that Wall Street is only gonna get smarter, making new toys to make money, and hide responsibility, and banning CDS is going to do nothing about it, so how do we change the culture, or are the quants going to keep coming, and keep inventing until they cause the next one? -
How does the average Jane or John Doe investor make modest gains in conservative invements such as CD's, when the Federal government has flooded the finanical markets with cheap money/loans? Will CD rates continue to hover around the 1 %- 1.5 %range? -

-

-

-
I only see opportunity. Which sub sector do I need to enter on Wallstreet for big money. Everybody has 24hrs, I want to maximize mine. Wallstreet is I think the best shot. It never get and will be regulated to prevent big money making. Mr Lewi, what is yr advise, on which doors do I have to knock? -
Once the fog of war has lifted after events like these and apparent victors emerge, do you truly believe that those that profited so handsomely, despite the convictions of their self assuredness, really saw the whole story play out from start to finish, and could do it again and again? Or is it just a case of it being their turn to win at the table this time? -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
we are not out of this yet... I am from Detroit and there are a large number of homeowners who are still under water a great deal. I believe there is still a moral obligation, neighbor to neighbor, to continue to pay your mortgage. However, is there a moral obligation to pay the bank? The only reason to continue to pay on a home that is 50% of the value you purchased is to not "screw your neighbor". Otherwise, why pay? Is it because you don't want to ruin your credit? Try getting credit from a bank when your house is under water. The bank made the same bet you did when they signed the mortgage. They got bailed out, you didn't. Unless inflation increases a great deal, aren't the banks still in serious trouble? -
After writing this book, what are your thoughts on regulation and how it could prevent future potential financial meltdowns? For example, was the UK government correct in suspending short sales during the financial crisis, or does that kind of one-sided regulation only serve to exacerbate and prolong theses types of bubbles?
Car bombs target Iraq Shi'ites, killing 43
BAGHDAD - At least 43 people were killed in car bomb explosions targeting Shi'ite Muslims in the Iraqi capital and the southern oil hub of Basra on Monday, police and medics said. | Video
- Car bombs kill eight in Russia's Dagestan: investigators
- Two suspected militants killed in Yemen drone strike
- Iran electoral watchdog hints at Rafsanjani rejection
- Pakistan's MQM denounces Imran Khan in Karachi protest
- Egyptian army boosts forces in Sinai after kidnapping
- Five dead in Israeli bank robbery
- South Sudan army says retakes town from rebels in east

